ACLU-VT logo

ACLU-VT Legislative e-update; also, "Reckoning with Torture" program April 12

April 5, 2010
top
In this issue
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Bill Dies
Highway Safety Bills In Limbo
Reckoning With Torture
Civil Liberties Over Lunch

Hello --

The last time we wrote, after the town meeting break, we noted that the Vermont Yankee vote was over and that the budget battle was about to begin.

It took a little longer for the "battle" to start than one might have thought. That's because the budget the House passed in late March wasn't really a functional budget. It contained a wish list of cuts that weren't fleshed out until last week -- when details of the "Challenges for Change" document were released.

It seemed an odd way to do a budget -- establish targets and then try to figure out how to meet them .... and make sure the Senate has time to weigh in .... and all this by the adjournment deadline of April 30.

It's no wonder the mood in the Statehouse last week started in befuddlement. By week's end it was trending towards frustration, and this week it is likely to blossom into opposition.

The reality of the "Challenges for Change" proposals are sinking it.

On Tuesday, the public gets a chance to weigh in at a Statehouse hearing at 5 p.m.  It is likely to be a lively affair.

Budget deliberations are often not civil liberties issues. But the scope of the "Challenges for Change" proposals are so sweeping that it's impossible for the two not to be mixed.

For example, cost-saving proposals to the state's mental health system are based on changes to laws regarding involuntary medication. Forcing drugs on someone represents a huge threat to personal liberties.

Mandated consolidation of school districts could lead to changes in tax structures. That could impact the equity required by the Vermont Supreme Court's Brigham decision.

We reported last time that the message from communities' town meetings in early March was be frugal, but be responsible. The "Challenges for Change" approach meets the "frugal" test, but the Legislature is going to have to figure out if it's "responsible."

If you'd like to tell the Legislature what you think of the "Challenges for Change" proposals, attend the public hearing Tuesday from 5 to 7 p.m. at the Statehouse in Montpelier.

-- Allen Gilbert, executive director
-- Serena Hollmeyer, Loomis fellow

Return to top



Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Bill Dies

The Senate has given up on S. 226, the bill to create a dispensary system to provide medical marijuana to approved patients.

The House just isn't interested in the initiative, Senate leaders said. The bill -- approved by the Senate Government Operations Committee -- was repeatedly amended and eventually passed over when it came before the full Senate. Last week it was ordered "to lie," a parliamentary move that signals no further action. (To see the bill as it came out of committee, go to the
Senate Calendar of March 16 and navigate to Page 360.)

The bill was bitterly opposed by law enforcement. Individually and through a special panel, officers testified that the bill would lead to increased crime and increased drug abuse.

This is the second time the Senate has taken the lead on a drug reform issue and the House has balked. The other was two years ago, when the Senate voted to relax prosecution of possession of small amounts of marijuana.

It seems ironic that the Legislature is being asked to change the state's involuntary medication laws while it balks at voluntary medical use of a drug whose only drawback seems to be an image problem. Even the American Medical Association now acknowledges the palliative effects of marijuana.

The ACLU has worked with other organizations and individuals on this issue for a number of years. One such group is the Vermont Alliance for Intelligent Drug Laws, or VALIDVT. Also, there's comprehensive information on national drug law reform efforts at the National ACLU's Drug Law Reform Project's site.


Return to top


Highway Safety Bills In Limbo

While the Legislature sinks into debate over the "money" bills -- the capital, transportation, and budget bills -- other bills passed by one chamber but not the other hang in limbo. These bills may be taken up whenever there's a break in financial discussions. Or they may be held until late in the session, when the press of adjournment leads to deal-making and compromises.

Highway safety is likely to be one of those issues that sits around until a deal's been made and leadership pushes the compromise.

The disagreement between the House and Senate is over the scope of the measures to be enacted. Both chambers agree texting while driving should be banned. The disagreement is whether other highway safety measures should be taken up as well. The House says "yes," the Senate "no."

The ACLU
remains concerned about the primary seatbelt enforcement provision the House is pressing. ("Primary" enforcement means police can stop you solely on suspicion you're not using your seatbelt.) Because of the potential for arbitrary stops, we think that police should be required to collect racial/ethnic/gender data when they make stops. Collecting "stop data" is the most effective tool in preventing racial profiling -- an issue that has plagued the state for many years, with allegations from minorities that they are routinely targeted by police. (Read the Racial Profiling in Vermont 2009 report by the Vermont Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.)

The disagreement between the two chambers is sharp. It's the sort of conflict you'd usually associate with opposing political parties. (Procedurally, the expansive House bill on highway safety has been grafted onto the more narrow Senate bill on texting; last year, the Senate didn't act on the House's highway safety bill.) So far, neither side has indicated it will retreat from its position.


Return to top


Reckoning With Torture

Accountability for torture Following the events of Sept. 11, 2001, the United States launched a "War on Terror" -- a war against an enemy ill-defined and tied to no geographic place.

The tactics employed by the U.S. government to wage the war ranged from conventional combat to espionage. They also included torture, a fact denied by the government at the time but since confirmed in thousands of pages of documents obtained by the ACLU through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

On Monday, April 12, librarians, lawyers, professors, students, writers, and others will read from recently released secret documents - memos, declassified communications, and testimonies by detainees at Guantanamo and elsewhere.

The event is sponsored by the ACLU-VT and the University of Vermont Libraries. It will take place at 7 p.m. at Memorial Lounge of the Waterman Building on the UVM campus in Burlington. It's free and open to the public.

Featured readers include:

  • Philip Baruth, UVM English professor and writer
  • David Budbill, writer
  • Stephanie Farrior, Vt. Law School international law professor
  • Robert Gensburg, Guantanamo detainee laywer
  • Traci Griffith, Saint Michael's College communications professor
  • Ateqah Khaki, ACLU National Security Program staff
  • Trina Magi, UVM library professor
  • Travis Nelson, UVM political science professor
  • Hilary Neroni, UVM film studies professor
  • Adelit Rukomangana, M.A. in theology, native of Rwanda
  • David Sleigh, Guantanamo detainee lawyer
  • Emma Vick, UVM student
  • Sydnee Viray, social worker, advocate, and UMV staff member

The event is being held during National Library Week in recognition of the important work that libraries do to make information available to the public.

Click this link for a list of the readings, and samples from the documents to be read.

A copy of a 2009 New York Times story, "ACLU Lawyers Mine Documents for Truth," can be found in The New York Times archives.

We'll also be providing updates on the ACLU-VT Facebook page about the event -- background on the readers and on the documents.



Return to top
 

Civil Liberties Over Lunch In Middlebury

Want to talk about civil liberties as you munch your lunch?

The Ilsley Public Library in Middlebury and the ACLU have teamed up to sponsor a four-part reading and discussion series on challenges to and protection of basic rights. The discussion began in February but runs through May 19. You can catch up.

  • Gideon's Trumpet by Anthony Lewis, April 21, guest speaker attorney Mitch Pearl.
  • Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age by Kevin Boyle, May 19, guest speaker ACLU-VT Executive Director Allen Gilbert.

All discussions take place at 12:15 p.m. at the library.




Return to top


Quick Links...

 
Join Our Mailing List
.